A fellow classmates point of view, Mr. Stephen Si. He is one of the people is who is for the RH Bill. A neutral stand he has when it comes on the topic of believing in God. He argued that people who do believe in our creator could sometimes be very confusing. I guess it would most probably be when someone takes the bible literally that would really cause plenty of doubt and confusion towards many people. I believe that the bible should not be taken literally because that it would lose the point and true meaning of anything that the it says there.
God asks us to think more deeply with his words so that we could fully understand his word. Much like when the bible says, (any versions: whether it is King James, New international version, NLT and etc) "be fruitful and multiply and increase your number" you cannot just go ahead having kids incessantly, without thinking further its responsibilities, the ones they will go through once they have a child. They ought to make sure that they are able to provide basic things for them their shelter, education and food. The fact that there are plenty of kids wandering around the streets show that our beloved country is not able to make parents more aware of their responsibilities.
“God gave us free will, so why not use that free will to decide for ourselves?”, he added. I will quote his one strong opinion about the Church’s beliefs.
“Another thing I’d like to seriously point out about the beliefs of the church is that most of the time, their own beliefs clash with one another. It doesn’t even make sense sometimes. Let’s give a hypothetical situation. Let’s say there is a family in poverty and they live in a slum area. They already have three kids which obviously more than they can afford. When asked, they prefer not to have another child. So how does that work? They’re married so they obviously have the right to have sexual intercourse. If they no longer want children they’re not allowed to have sex anymore? Doesn’t that also contradict their beliefs that married couples should be allowed to have sex as a symbol of their love?”
"“It’s not as simple as saying that just because we’re not overpopulated doesn’t mean people won’t starve.”
“Ang stupid talaga, sana wag nalang tayo magbulagbulagan sa reality eh. We really need that bill if not, people are not going to be disciplined. They would not have any information or guide on how they could survive their poor lives. Pag walang RH Bill, para narin natin tinanggalan ng chance makabawi sa life yung mga tao. God did not die for us to suffer more. His death saved us just like the crappy Church is teaching. Then why are we stopping the RH Bill. Sana dina madelay to. Come on people think! Wake up, this is reality. We are screwed up anyway why not face its consequences?"
No comments:
Post a Comment